Talk:Undone (MercyMe album)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 02:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


Infobox edit

  • List the locations of where the album was recorded in the "Recorded" section
    • Fixed.
  • Source for release date of "Here With Me" is not necessary in this context
    • Removed.

Lead edit

  • It was produced by Pete Kipley and released on April 20, 2004. Specify what record label released the album
  • ...was released to Christian... Specify what this means in its context

Background and recording edit

  • Undone was produced by Pete Kipley. It was recorded by F. Reid Shippen, Mike O' Connor, and Steve Bishir... Combine into one sentence for better prose

Composition edit

  • No issues

Reception edit

  • ...and music wer too similar to the band's previous efforts... Fix spelling mistake
  • ...reflect the trend in secular adult alternative[disambiguation needed]... Fix disambiguation issue
  • Tony Cummings of Cross Rhythms gave the album nine out of ten stars, calling it a "huge improvement" over Spoken For.[10] Put year in parentheses of "Spoken For"

Singles edit

  • No issues

Track listing edit

  • No issues

Personnel edit

  • No issues

Charts and certifications edit

  • No issues

Release history edit

  • No issues

References edit

  • Reference 5 Provide actual link to source (Google Books has a lot of archived issues of Billboard magazine)
  • Reference 8 "CCM Magazine" and "Salem Publishing" do not need to be wiki-linked, as they were already
  • References 14-17, 22, 23, 26, 27 "Billboard" and "Prometheus Global Media" do not need to be wiki-linked
  • Reference 21 "Billboard.biz" should not be wiki-linked
  • Reference 25 "Recording Industry Association of America" should not be wiki-linked
  • References 28 & 29 "Allmusic" and "Rovi Corporation" should not be wiki-linked
  • Fixed. Toa Nidhiki05 03:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are some prose issues and reference formatting issues that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, I will be more than happy to help. Rp0211 (talk2me) 03:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Continue the good work as it is much appreciated by Wikipedia and its readers. Rp0211 (talk2me) 05:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply