Talk:Under-19 Women's T20 World Cup

Same article

@Lugnuts: the two pages which are ICC Under-19 Women's Twenty20 World Cup and Under-19 Women's Cricket World Cup, are looking similar, according to me. Please see this matter. চ্যাম্পিয়ন স্টার ১ (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Done - thanks for spotting this. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Format

Hi @Lugnuts, Joseph2302, and Bs1jac:, On which format does this tournament is going to be played T20 or WT20I? On this article playing format is stated as 20 overs, where as on this article playing format is stated as WT20I. Which one is correct? Fade258 (talk) 07:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The first edition is 20-overs. It can't be WT20I, as it's an under-19 tournament. I'll double check all the pages and update. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt reply and for your guidance. Well, I have just created a redirected article 2022 ICC Under-19 Women's T20 World Cup qualification as it probably passes the WP:GNG. Fade258 (talk) 07:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Article issues

1. As discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket#ICC Women's Under-19 Cricket World Cup, the qualifiers for 2025 and 2027 have not yet been announced, so stop re-adding tables listing qualifiers fake qualifiers for those events (so far @Divyakaran Singh Joshi, PrashantSahu1177, and MD Hydrogen 123: have all reverted this fake information, which MD Hydrogen 123 has even admitted is made up, as the ICC haven't announced qualifying format yet)
2. MOS:INFOBOXFLAG says that infoboxes should not contain flags in general, so people should stop adding flags next to the years and winners in the infobox

If people continue to violate these, I will be forced to seek administrative action at WP:ANI, as this continued disruption by multiple users is unacceptable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with guidelines and a focus on verifiability, not a fandom site to guess or make up things. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

I'll go further. The "records" section looks awfully like Original Research to me. Is there any source whatsoever for this? This seems to be the case for all of the statistical bits and pieces. Please give us some form of indication of where this information comes from - preferably within the net seven days. Thanks.

I've also removed a tonne of flags, used the {{crw19|}} template rather than duplicating things where it's appropriate and stopped forcing table width columns. I imagine this has come into place here as people copy table formatting from other competitions.

I have concerns that the next two editions of this tournament may not even happen or may happen in a radically different format to that which is being imagined here. To echo Joseph's point above: stop making shit up until we know, for certain, that it's going to happen.

Thanks Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Yep, unfortunately there's no general statistics page on Cricinfo yet for whole tournament records (presumably as there's only been one edition), which is presumably where those kind of statistics are usually sourced from. Mpk662 (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)