Talk:Unattractiveness
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sabrinajoy1020.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Seems petty... but "Internet" is a little old-fashioned edit
@Dimadick: I tried and failed to find specific Wikipedia policy regarding the capitalisation of "internet". However, in the article it is being used as an adjective: in this form it is often left uncapitalised. Besides, in non-American forms of English, "internet" is rarely considered a proper noun anyway. What was your reasoning in capitalising it? Thanks — Quasar G t - c 16:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Because the main article Internet defines it as a proper name and consistently capitalizes it, alongside ARPANET, CYCLADES, the Merit Network, the NPL network, the Tymnet, and Telenet. It is quite standard for network names. Dimadick (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
That doesn't really matter, as in the phrase "internet forum", "internet" is acting as an adjective rather than a noun. However, the article on Internet forums seems to prefer the capitalised version as well. Still seems a little old-fashioned, but hey. Quasar G t - c 17:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
"Celebrities" section edit
I've removed it, since it only referenced Buzz Nigeria, which seems to be some sort of celebrity gossip magazine and likely not a reliable source. Several of the people listed were living people, as well. I wouldn't necessarily be opposed if someone added a well-sourced analysis of the implications of lookism in celebrity culture, but in its recently reverted form it seems like nothing more than listcruft. --SamX 22:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)