Talk:Un dì, felice, eterea

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Entry needs work; Italian is not accurate and translation is a very loose one.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.152.210.186 (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Completely agree. English translation is garbage. Will find a better one. -67.78.138.82 (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

What about this? http://goodmusicadventure.blogspot.com/2006/08/david-byrne-un-di-felice-eterea-verdi.html
One day, you, happy, ethereal,
appeared in front of me,
and ever since,trembling,
I lived from unknowed love.
That love that's the
pulse of the universe, of the whole universe,
Mysterious, mysterious and proud,
torture and delight to the heart.
It's incomplete though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.135.194.198 (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Completely agree!! The transaltion is so unaccurate! It's just something completely different! Bad, bad, very bad. Defenetely this has to be completely reworked. At least I copy the previous one--77.209.137.226 (talk) 11:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic