This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The usual name for this hill locally is 'Uley Bury', and not the elided form 'Uleybury'. It is not only its colloquial form that uses the two word version: all public documents- OS maps, the register of Scheduled Ancient Monuments, sundry geological/archaeological/environmental publications, etc. refer to 'Uley Bury'.
The only regular use of the name 'Uleybury' nowadays is in connection with the place of that name in Australia.
This article should therefore be reindexed as 'Uley Bury', with some reference to the occasional/ archaic use of the elided form.
But I didn't check too closely to make sure the high results weren't referring to something else (an Australian place, apparently). It'll have to be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, because the destination has history and we can't overwrite that. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply