Talk:Uganda Muslim Supreme Council
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Freedom4U in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
 | A fact from Uganda Muslim Supreme Council appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Freedom4U talk 22:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council has revised its constitution three times in its 50 years of existence? Source: "They also resolved to examine Constitutions of 1972, 1982, and 1986 and other vital documents pertaining to the task at hand." https://www.homelandmedia.co.ug/lifestyle/religion/uganda-muslim-supreme-council-constitution-amendment-process-begins-work/"The Uganda Muslim Supreme Council (UMSC) General Assembly on Wednesday night ratified the new constitution which gives Mufti Shaban Mubajje a new lease of life concluding seeking reelection" https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/muslim-top-organ-changes-constitution-amid-protest-3880654
- ALT1: ... that the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council was created to bring together the divided Muslim community in Uganda? Source: "The Muslims who were the most divided came up with a suggestion for a united administrative body that had a unitary constitution. Most of the Muslim delegates agreed that Islamic unity in Uganda was long overdue. They gave suggestions of how their administration should be constituted. Kasozi 1985, pg 40
- ALT2: ... that the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council became "the richest landlord" in Uganda after inheriting land left behind by the Asian Muslims who were expelled by dictator Idi Amin? Source: "When the Asians were forced to leave Uganda, the government decided that "properties belonging to religious missions of departing Asians will go to African religious missions of the same creed." As the majority of Asian properties were registered under their religious organizations and as the majority of them were Muslim, the Supreme Council by 1973 became the richest landlord in the country." Kasozi 1985, pg 42
- Reviewed: [[]]
- Comment: This would be my second DYK, so I don't have to do a QPQ. Additionally, the Kasozi source that I used is hard to access, so I can email it to the reviewer if so desired.
Moved to mainspace by BaduFerreira (talk). Self-nominated at 12:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Uganda Muslim Supreme Council; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I'm going to review the first hook, as I think it's the most compact and easy-to-read.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Regarding the QPQ: reviewer has nom'ed less than 5, so it should be OK. A few quick fixes and I think it should be OK! Gen. Quon[Talk] 21:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! Like you said the qualifications that I have in the article are pretty much straight from one of my sources, but I thought it would've been okay since that doesn't seem like something that should be rewritten too heavily. Would it be acceptable to include the qualifications for that role word-for-word, if I put in a template like I have in this article? BaduFerreira (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think that would work. You could also just copy and paste them word-for-word, but add in some quote markers.--Gen. Quon[Talk] 15:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I've gone ahead and added quotation markers to the qualifications section! BaduFerreira (talk) 19:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think that would work. You could also just copy and paste them word-for-word, but add in some quote markers.--Gen. Quon[Talk] 15:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! Like you said the qualifications that I have in the article are pretty much straight from one of my sources, but I thought it would've been okay since that doesn't seem like something that should be rewritten too heavily. Would it be acceptable to include the qualifications for that role word-for-word, if I put in a template like I have in this article? BaduFerreira (talk) 11:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Good to go then!--Gen. Quon[Talk] 17:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)