Talk:UXV Combatant

UXV

There is no description of what the letters UXV stand for. Is it an abbreviation for something or what? UXV is not a word in the English language, so is it a name? Should it be HMS UXV?

Service

Is there any information regarding if the UVX will be in service in the US Navy or the Royal Navy? Tsurugi (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Since it is being designed and will likely be built by BAE Systems in cooperation with General Dynamics, I would expect both. I just rewrote this article, so if you have any further questions, you can let me know on my talk page. --Bismarck43 (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Some Inconsistencies

In my research I came across this article however I have noticed some inconsistencies with the source.

The problem is that the source indicates that it is a concept ship & that if approved it will not go into service until post 2020 yet the Wikipedia article by the mention of the keyword "planned" indicates that this is not a concept & that it has been approved by the DoD.

I would really love to see ships such as this in service but I think we should not as Wikipedia contributors modify the facts to suite our desires. Can the author of the document please change the first paragraph to indicate that this is a concept warship awaiting development approval. Thanks in advance. AussieSkeptic82 (talk) 03:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

You mean MoD not DoD but other than that I agree with you, please be bold and edit it yourself. G.R. Allison (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok sorry about the MoD oversight, my mixture that is my background nationalities both refer to their defense arm of the government ::department of defense & not as the MoD, hence my oversight :) I'll modify it, please inform me if you disagree with the edit. AussieSkeptic82 (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Increasingly Likel y

hey sorry but im not very happy with the "increasingly likely" statement. is it actually being considered by the mod? i see no reference anywhere kieran — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.191.251 (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Taken care of, thanks for pointing it out! :) G.R. Allison (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UXV Combatant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080202145515/http://www.baesystems.com:80/Newsroom/NewsReleases/autoGen_107810163127.html to http://www.baesystems.com/Newsroom/NewsReleases/autoGen_107810163127.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)