Talk:US public opinion on the North American Free Trade Agreement

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NAFTA vs North American Free Trade Agreement in the article title

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm wondering if this article might be better moved to "US Public Opinion on NAFTA". Per MOS guidance WP:ACRONYMTITLE, acronyms in titles should be used where the subject is more known by its acronym; whether that is the case here, I don't know (personally I do think so, but my opinion hardly matters). But given how long the title is when spelled out fully, for that reason alone the acronym could work better. Views? DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support move - this is probably the slightly more well-known name, and would bring it in line with other NAFTA-related articles, including Effects of NAFTA on Mexico, and NAFTA's effect on United States employment. MarginalCost (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic