Talk:USS Winnebago (1863)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll do this one.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   1) There is no reference for note 12 (ORN vol. 7).

   Copy-paste error, fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

No dablinks, no issues with prose, external links or citation errors, images good. Zawed (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Note issue (criteria 2) fixed, passing for GA. Zawed (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)