This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Was sunk in 1974 on way to being scrapped according to first part of article. Not in service to Brazil until 1996 as stated. Abercrom (talk) 21:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
That seems unlikely. The U.S. Navy's Naval History and Heritage Command site says: "Strong was decommissioned and struck from the Navy list on 31 October 1973. She was transferred to the government of Brazil the same day as Rio Grande De Norte (D-37) and still serves that government." I don't know what date "still" refers to, and it's likely that the NHHC page was not further updated. However, the Navsource Naval History site says: "Transferred to Brazil 31 October 1973, renamed Rio Grande Do Norte (D 37). Fate[:] Stricken 06 February 1996. In 1997, she was under tow from Brazil to India to be scrapped when she foundered in high seas off the coast of Durban, South Africa, and was reported by Brazil to have sunk."
I don't know whether the Navsource Naval History site is a WP:RS; but it's cited in the article.