Talk:USS Mission Bay/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 02:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Really nice article expansion there, kind of like what I did with submarines some time ago. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Image review

• Images look fine. Even if the uplaoder of File:CVE59 Mission Bay 1.jpg didn't own the copyright, its PD because it was taken by the US Navy.

Source review

• All sources look reliable, except for https://www.hazegray.org/ . I've never been really good at determining the reliability of online references, but I have some doubts about it. I think most if not all of the info found there could sourced by other sources.

• Most of the information within hazegray is mirrored in the other sources. I suppose it's rather redundant.

Lead

• I really think that the lead could be expanded at least a few lines with more details of her wartime career. I'll re-review afterwards.

Design

• link stern
• This section looks good except that I would suggest changing the caption of the image from "A profile of the design of Takanis Bay, which was shared with all Casablanca-class escort carriers" to something like "Profile of a Casablanca-class escort carrier".

Construction

• remove the redlink for the captain, I really don't think he would be notable or that anyone would write an article on him.

Career

• rm the William Ellis Gentner redlink
• link mothballed to Reserve fleet.
• The rest looks good.

GA Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• @L293d: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 04:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
• @L293D: Reping. Stikkyy t/c 04:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• Good work. The lead still needs some more content though. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

• @L293D: I've added a bit more. Stikkyy t/c 07:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

• Great work, closing as promoted. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.