This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
'Essex' had 26 12-pounders and 10 6-pounders (lighter guns above the gun deck), according to http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/e5/essex-i.htm. This makes her notationally a 32 gun frigate; in other words, naval personnel of the time would have referred to her as a 32 gun, 12 pound frigate. This notational number of guns might persist through re-armaments. Guns are removed when such a ship is placed in ordinary, so the initial armament may have been changed in 1809.
The armament in the data panel may reflect her armament as HMS Essex--such modifications by the RN were usual. However, I also came across a complaint by Captain Porter that she should have cannons not carronades going into the Pacific, so she could have been rearmed then
My guess is that her initial armament was long guns--carronades were not that popular then; that she was rearmed with carronades in 1809 or 1812, but probably kept the same number of guns; and that the data panel numbers reflect HMS Essex. However, while the navy.mil site can be considered authoritative of her having that armament at some point, which point is not certain.
I have decided against editing the article, as I cannot fully resolve the issues and this is not the place to discuss the difference between notational and actual guns. Laguna CA (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
She did have carronades as I have read elsewhere. This is very significant because it is probably why she lost her last battle. The British frigate simply stayed out for the range of the carronades and used its long guns to nearly destroy Essex. Pgrudin (talk) 12:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply