Talk:USS Balch (DD-50)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jackyd101 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria. I know that this review may seem cursory, but I have read it thoroughly and I genuinely have no additional questions or comments, it is a very good article.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
A very minor thing, but Lord Charles Beresford had been made a baron by October 1916, and therefore the correct form of address should be Lord Beresford (without the Charles). --Jackyd101 (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.