Talk:UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tavix in topic Requested move 01 August 2016
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability
editAs per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines this constituent academic faculty does not appear to meet guidelines for its own article - redirecting to UCL Faculty of Biomedical Sciences.Codf1977 (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- The UCL Institute of Child Health, like the UCL Institute of Neurology, has hundreds of staff, is the largest institute of its kind in Europe, was in existence for a long period as an independent institution before merging with UCL, and is world famous in its own right. Again I note that the Wikipedia guidelines clearly state: 'If an institution's faculties, constituent academic colleges, or academic departments are especially notable or significant they may have their own dedicated article'. Rangoon11 (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 01 August 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as uncontroversial. -- Tavix (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
UCL Institute of Child Health → UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health – Institute name change – HofmansN (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Why was this contested? -- Tavix (talk) 16:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it'd be a better idea to discuss this, but it seems to be uncontroversial due to the lack of discussion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll go ahead and close it then. -- Tavix (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- I thought it'd be a better idea to discuss this, but it seems to be uncontroversial due to the lack of discussion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.