Talk:UB.109T

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LilianaUwU in topic Citation 7 page number inaccuracy

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk21:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 20:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   New enough and large enough expansion. QPQ present. Maury Markowitz, you might be interested in learning about the |adj= parameter of {{convert}}, given that several areas needed it. I can't access the full book, but I saw a preview to verify ALT0. Both hooks are interesting. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 20:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Citation 7 page number inaccuracy

edit

Citation 7 on this page, High Stakes, Britain's Air Arms In Action 1945-1990 by Vic Flintham has an incorrect page number. While the page references page 273 as the origins of the information referenced, the correct page would be page 141.


I'd correct this myself but cannot alter the citations, so if someone would be willing to change them to be more accurate I would be very thankful!


Thanks for reading! Unbased (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done. It took me a minute to figure it out, but I did it. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply