Talk:U.S. Route 59 in Oklahoma/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Imzadi1979 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 12:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I will get to this later today or tomorrow. Imzadi 1979  12:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

DABs and ELs look good.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I have just two prose comments listed below.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    I'd like to see more photos, but that doesn't impact the listing of the article. The map should have a caption though, I think.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    There's just a pair of comments that are possibly more like personal writing preferences. Imzadi 1979  02:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Prose comments

  • Constructions like "US-59 / 270 head" seem awkward, because I read that as a single highway with a combined name. If it were "US-59 and US-70 head" that would work to me, but otherwise that's one name, so a singular subject.
  • "interchanging" as a verb doesn't work right, because it the traditional definition of the verb, the two highways would be changing places. I'd stick to something like "meets" or even "junctions".