This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't there be a results section that highlights the agreements that were made. Or, if there was none, a criticism section would seem appropriate.
"Vice-Minister Zhang Guobao of the powerful National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) spoke on energy issues." What were the issues? What did he say about them?
"NDRC Vice-Minister Xie Zhenhua talked about the substantial steps that China is taking to limit CO2 emissions." What are the steps? How are they substantial?
"Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke briefed Chinese officials about how the U.S. plans to keep inflation in check over the next few years." What is the plan? Does it involve reducing the trade imbalance?
I agree. It seems that most of the point were added as the summit progressed when few detail were available. Numerous press and media reports, fact sheets and join statements have subsequently been released. So if someone would like to add some more substantive details and outcomes, go right ahead. 76.69.60.132 (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply