Talk:Typhoon Lupit (2009)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jason Rees in topic Importance
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.png)
Importance
editAlthough I understand your view for this being mid-importance Jason Rees, considering the location of the storm, it's really a low-importance article. Albeit a Category 5, since the storm was in the Western Pacific, Category 5 really doesn't make it mid-importance since there is at least one Cat:5 in the basin each year. Also, there was little damage and no loss of life from the storm, overall, an easily forgetable typhoon. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- The cat 5 wasnt why i upped it. I upped it because PAGASA were saying that Lupit took a really wierd track and are directly relating it to climate change.Jason Rees (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)