Talk:Typhoon Holly (1984)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by HickoryOughtShirt?4 in topic GA Review
![]() | Typhoon Holly (1984) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 10, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Holly (1984)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: pass
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review
editLead
editform
, did you mean from?- Can
tropical depression
be wikilinked?
Meteorological history
editWhile Tropical Storm Gerald was forming in the South China Sea,the Western Pacific...
, please make a space after the commaA large storm, Holly slowly deepened,
oddly worded- Better? YE Pacific Hurricane 03:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
References
edit- Reference 16 is freely available here. Is it possible to still attach the URL?
- Reference 10 is freely available here. Is it possible to still attach the URL?
- Not free :P YE Pacific Hurricane 03:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, only the first paragraph was. Linking it might still be useful for those with subscriptions/Wikipedia has ways of accessing such resources. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- IIRC, the – via Lexis Nexis (subscription required) is suppose to cover the issue with accessibility bit. I'd argue adding a url with an accessdate from a paywall would technically be inaccurate since that's not how I personally accessed it. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yellow Evan, Alright, that's fair. I'm passing this article HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- IIRC, the – via Lexis Nexis (subscription required) is suppose to cover the issue with accessibility bit. I'd argue adding a url with an accessdate from a paywall would technically be inaccurate since that's not how I personally accessed it. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, only the first paragraph was. Linking it might still be useful for those with subscriptions/Wikipedia has ways of accessing such resources. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not free :P YE Pacific Hurricane 03:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)