Talk:Typhoon Dan (1989)

Typhoon Dan (1989) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 6, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although 1989's Typhoon Dan was relatively weak, the storm left hundreds of thousands of people homeless in the Philippines?

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Dan (1989)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 04:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Two images: both WPCommons hosted, both public domain
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Notes

"1-minute maximum sustained winds of 130 km/h (80 mph).[1] The JMA indicates that Dan peaked slightly afterward, with 10-minute sustained winds of 140 km/h (85 mph)" - isn't the 1-minute maximum sustained wind supposed to be higher than the 10-minute sustained wind? Which number at [1] records this wind measurement?

"89101212 002 5 168 1113 960 075 90090 0090 90300 0300" – 075 = 75 knots = 85 mph, and the JMA uses 10-minute winds by default. In theory, 1-minute winds should be greater than 10-minute winds, but since they're recorded by different agencies, they don't always coincide. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for double checking. maclean (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ref 3 = National Disaster Coordinating Council. - does National refer to the Philippines? Perhaps the |location= parameter would be appropriate here.

Not sure actually. Here's their main home page, but it doesn't mention any location in particular... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it is the Philippines. I added the parameter: [2] maclean (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah its the Phillipine NDCC.Jason Rees (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cool, thanks both! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic