Talk:Type 965 radar
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section headings should be relevant to the contents of their sections edit
I have no objections to there being sections on development and operational history.
However, a section on development ought to contain information on development - and I have not found sources that would support this. Information about the procurement decision, and the choices available is very different from information on development.
Similarly I would expect a section on operational history to contain information on the radar's roughly 50 years of front-line service in different navies. I would not expect it to just contain a few facts on its operational capabilities.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Bibliography used, please? edit
Hi Toddy1, thanks for putting together this article so shortly after it was requested. Can you please add the list of bibliographic sources used, with complete details? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 13:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)