Talk:Type 901 fast combat support ship

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

CorenSearchBot Error edit

How is this article a duplicate of this article?

"gentries" → gantries edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have changed "gentries" to 'gantries'. I am guessing that was the author's intent. If not, please do what you think best.Chjoaygame (talk) 02:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

bmpt.livejournal.com edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reliability of bmpd.livejournal.com has been challenged before at Talk:9K720_Iskander#Algeria_operator_-_Unreliable_cited_material. In that case, the blog article cited a professional publication. After discussion, bmpd.livejournal.com was not found to be adequate; the professional publication was used instead.

In this case (https://bmpd.livejournal.com/2885968.html), the blog article is not even citing a professional publication, but social medias sources. If bmpd.livejournal.com was inadequate in the above case, it's inadequate here as well.

(I would also note that it is not obvious what editorial oversight is exercised by the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies over bmpd.livejournal.com. According to the blog profile, it is a catch-all for articles from CAST's own staff, and other associates, that apparently cannot be included in CAST's more professional publications.

It is striking that the article in question does not even include the identity of the author. Other bmpd.livejournal.com articles do identify the author (seemingly by livejournal profiles) which might be used to gauge the article's reliability. No such thing can be done with this article.)

Finally, it has been, according to the article, half-a-year since the event the article refers to took place. If that information isn't showing up and being corroborated by unequivocally reliable sources, then that suggests that the claims being made are weak. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 23:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic