This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
All info relating to Ref 8 needs to be deleted it was actually referring to the type 002 carrier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucinator (talk • contribs) 22:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Shandong 17 (001A) is now 002. This should be 004.edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Article needs to be gutted of bad material and referencesedit
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I checked 2 of them and both refered to the Type 003 carrier and not the type 004
As of 2017, China hoped to complete this carrier by the late 2020s, and indicated that up to four might be built.[9]
In April 2018, news.com.au, an Australian tabloid claimed that metal cutting for the Type 004 began back in December 2017.[11] 108.26.243.70 (talk) 00:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply