Talk:Two for the Road (Lost)/GA1

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The lead is quite short; please increase.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Even though all the sources seem reliable, some of them aren't available anymore; please check this.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   please increase the "Reception" section.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   the last time the article was edited (besides my typoe fix) was 28 of July.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Please increase the reception section and the lead; and check the sources. Music2611 (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

   I have increased the lead and fixed the references. Still working on the reception section. I would appreciate some input on the lead (Is it long enough now?). Thanks! --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 15:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

   The lead is good, thanks Music2611 (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

   Worked on reception section, tell me what you think! --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 15:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

   I'm sorry, but it still requires some more expansion. Music2611 (talk) 11:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

   Could you be more specific in what you're looking for? That section has information on ratings and reviews (positive and negative). --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 01:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

   Sorry, I've read it again, it's definetely a pass! Music2611 (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)