Talk:Two Concepts of Liberty

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

404 link

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The document "TLDOC: Berlin's two concepts of liberty" has gone 404, as of 2009-01-06 -- 58.187.23.93 (talk) 11:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Abuse" of concepts of liberty

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If there's going to be an "rhetorical abuse of positive liberty" section, then surely considerations of balance indicate that there should be a "rhetorical abuse of negative liberty" section. Moreover rhetorical abuses of negative liberty are arguably much more relevant in the current political climate, regardless of whether or not "positive liberty" was abused in the 20th century... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.144.107.159 (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Positive liberty should be defined in the introduction

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The introduction includes Berlin's definition of negative liberty, but his definition of positive liberty should included in the introduction too. 86.27.249.220 (talk) 23:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic