Talk:Twin Cities PBS

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Twin Cities PBS article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weather edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's been a while since I've actually been in MN, but why does the article no longer mention that 17 airs MnDOT Aviation Weather when other programming is not scheduled? That takes up a large chunk of the station's airtime, so it seems like it would be important to mention. I'd rather leave the edit to someone that's actually in state right now, though. Jason Patton 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Too much awards info edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I mean really, there is way too much space devoted to station awards in this article. It makes the whole thing virtually unreadable. Sure, some awards could be considered noteworthy, but this is ridiculous. If it's notable, likely it is mentioned on the station's website. I'm going to be bold here and remove this stuff, and if anyone has a problem with this action, post your reasons below. I'm open-minded about this, but as it stands right now, all this stuff shouldn't be here.--Fightingirish 20:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic