WikiProject Oregon opts out edit

I believe that the consensus of WikiProject Oregon is that members can remove the project tag from any article they feel is not part of its scope. Two members have removed the WP:ORE tag from this article because we feel it is not necessary to monitor it as part of the project. My interpretation of "Not unique to Oregon" is "Tuyas do not exist only in Oregon" much like the generic geological feature cinder cone, which also is outside the scope of WP:ORE. If there is a different interpretation of "unique to Oregon", please explain. Honestly, project tags are "no big deal" and the projects themselves should have the right to remove the tags. If you would like to petition the entire membership of WP:ORE about the issue, feel free to bring it up on the project talk page. Thanks! Katr67 (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note this was discussed on the project page previously: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon/archive3#Train articles within scope of project? Katr67 (talk) 03:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps a picture would make more sense? edit

So another source described it as "mushroom shaped" with the ice sheet as providing support for the "stem" of the mushroom and the "cap" collapsing when the ice receded. This article describes a "lake" where the volcano exits the top of the ice sheet? Also wondering about ice sheet compression effects. I live in the Puget Sound area and the last ice sheet, estimated at 1000 meters thick, depressed the surrounding region which is now rising (rebounding) at centimeters per decade. Do the Tuyas stop erupting when the downward pressure on the magma chamber ceases? Shjacks45 (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply