Talk:Tutor.com
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tokyogirl79 in topic Unencyclopedic Content
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Unencyclopedic Content
editI removed most of the stuff from this article since it was purely unencyclopedic. By that I mean that either the information was not relevant to the company itself or it's written like an advertisement to the point where there's really no way to keep it. I honestly don't know if this article is noteworthy enough to stay on here since there aren't any hits on google that aren't advertisement or vanity pieces. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
- And by not relevant to the company I mean that the article listed information about general online tutoring features which is already greatly highlighted on the online tutoring page. There's no need to list it twice. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79