This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The user "Wario-Man" reverted my edit:
According to Fritz Hommel and some Azerbaijanian historians Turukkeans were the ancestor of Turks.[1][2][3][4][5]
But there are many phrases in Wikipedia like this. For example:
According to Arshak Safrastian, the Medes and Scythians mentioned in classical Greek literature existed only as preconceived notions. (see Corduene)
The reason that I used the phrase according to is there is a notion, if you accept or you don't accept. If this is a "free encyclopedia", why do you delete some sourced information?
--2001:A98:C060:80:2DE7:63A4:7B2C:BE1F (talk) 12:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Read WP:FRINGE. Plus, the source is unreliable. And you should talk about this article and your edit not the other articles. Because If article X (e.g. Corduene) has some issues and unreliable stuff, you should go there and edit it. How Corduene and its content is related to this article and your edit or my revert? You have added a fringe claim and unreliable sources, and I reverted your edit. Fritz Hommel's works are outdated just like his claims about the Sumerian language. And none of those Azerbaijani sources are WP:RS. --Wario-Man (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
References
^Fritz Hommel – Geschichte Babyloniens und Assyriens, 2016 (first edition: 1885)
