Talk:Turf War (The Office)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dom497 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I will begin reviewing this article as soon as I get a chance!--Dom497 (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Quality of the article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Everything looks good for this section of the review.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Everything looks good here.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    All statements have reliable sources.
    C. No original research:  
    No original research found within the article.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:  
    Information remains focused to the article topic.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    There are no edit wars but the info within the article is changing on a daily basis. I will wait for a few days to see what happens, then come to a conclusion for this section. Article is stable enough.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Image licenses look good.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Picture is appropriate and has a good caption.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply