Talk:Tupolev Tu-134

Links

Some of the technical details available

• http://www.aeroflot.org/tu_134.htm
• http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-134
• http://www.tupolev.ru/English/Show.asp?SectionID=144
• http://vivisimo.com/search?tb=homepage&query=Tupolev+Tu-134&v%3Asources=Web

Tech specs

It appears it has tech specs now. Should the notice be removed?

Nicknames

1. The NATO nickname belongs, as it does for every Soviet aircraft. These were official designations.
2. What's the source for the (mis-spelled) claimed Soviet nickname Galera? Very few Soviet aircraft had official nicknames and I will continue to remove it unless a source is cited. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 01:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Brakechute?

When did they stop making the Tu-134 with brakechute? RGDS Alexmcfire

Edit request on 20 April 2012

The date of accident/air disaster near Lviv

style="text-align:right;"| 5 March 1985||  CCCP-65856||  near Lviv||15+ 79/79

| Mid-air collision with military An-24 |-

is wrong, it happened on 03.05.1985, (May 3).

http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/view_details.cgi?date=05031985&reg=SSSR-65856&airline=Aeroflot

Date of Accident: 03 May 1985 Help Airline: Aeroflot Help Aircraft: Tupolev TU-134A Help Location: L'vov, Ukraine Help Registration: SSSR-65856 Help Previous Registrations: --- Help Flight Number: --- Help Fatalities: 94:94 Help MSN: 23253 Help Line Number: --- Help Engine Manufacturer: --- Help Engine Model: --- Help Year of Delivery: --- Help Accident Description: The aircraft crashed after colliding with a Soviet Air Force Antonov AN-26 aircraft. All 71 aboard the Tupolev were killed.

176.46.20.149 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Done WhaleyTim (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tupolev Tu-134. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607133218/http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/aircraft_detail.cgi?aircraft=Tupolev+TU-134 to http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/aircraft_detail.cgi?aircraft=Tupolev+TU-134

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

- Ahunt (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Rest room porthole

The one time I flew a TU-134 was around 1998, from Belgrade to Prague. It was the last revenue flight of the final Soviet-built plane in the CSA Airlines fleet. Which is why we flew low over the arrival runway before aborting the landing. It was a photo op, though the Serbian white-knuckle flyer I was sitting next to was kinda freaked. Among this plane's unique features was the small circular window in the rest room, something I've never seen on a commercial airliner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18E:C400:66F2:B120:C6D1:FAEC:98F0 (talk) 21:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

1st Soviet airliner with international certification?

"The Tu-134 was the first Soviet airliner to receive international certification from the International Civil Aviation Organization, which permitted it to be used on international routes." This claim is false or needs clarification. Tu-104 was in use on international routes before Tu-134. Did Tu-104 not have the same certification or not seems irrelevant. The claim is either incorrect or irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.253.238.230 (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Comecon or COMECON?

Really dumb question, I am just a newcomer (and I am having problems navigating the discussion pages, doesn't matter though), but isn't COMECON supposed to be all caps? Thank you.A-curious-child (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

The article is located at Comecon, while COMECON is just a redirect. If you want to debate which is correct for the main title, you will have to take that up at Talk:Comecon. - Ahunt (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Putting aside the capitalization problem, can you explain why I should not use redirects? Thank you. A-curious-child (talk) 03:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, not exactly "shouldn't", but what was wrong with my edit in the page? Please explain in layman terms if possible, thank you. A-curious-child (talk) 03:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Links to redirects are acceptable, but as I said in my edit summary, "it doesn't make sense to remove a direct link and replace it with a redirect." - Ahunt (talk) 04:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Edit request on January 9 2023

General cleanup needed A few errors, missing commas etc. throughout the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A03:D000:1406:5251:1:0:762B:E7CA (talk) 06:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)