This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The source cited is not currently active. Any more references? Thefuguestate 11:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I found the article from which this quote originally came (http://realmagick.com/articles/32/1032.html) and I would call into question its validity as a scholarly article. It does not cite its sources and seems to ignore more recent research. I very much doubt it has been through peer review. A valid source and probably a re-write is needed. Thefuguestate 11:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I added the expert tag. I'll look for a project that might help this --AW 19:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply