Talk:Tukde Tukde Gang
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Sagotreespirit (talk · contribs) on 3 February 2020. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Unlinkage of Pro-Govt Media to Godi Media edit
in the lead section of the article, the words pro-government media are linked to the Godi Media article. Since the context in which the sentence is written indicates that the thoughts of the wiki editor and not any primary source, the neutrality of the usage of pro-government in the sentence is biased. I unlinked the same, but another editor reverted my edit. Should this edit be carried out again? clickHereToGoToMyUserPage (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes. Godi-media is where India's pro-government media are being covered. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
complete slogan edit
 | This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:
Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments of consensus. |
the complete slogan by the islamist sloganeering is is "bharat tere tukde honge insha allah insha allah' LodoVena (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- So what? Are there are reliable sources that pay attention to the "complete slogan"? The second half simply means "If Allah wills it"; how is it in any way relevant to this article? As to the rest of your additions; politicians routinely use the term here as a pejorative; covering their soundbytes is a problem of undue weight. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
reliable source LodoVena (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)- You are not answering my question. What sources discuss the last portion of the quote as being relevant to the allegations of unpatriotic behavior? Vanamonde (Talk) 18:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
title of this source LodoVena (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
criticism section edit
| | This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:
Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments of consensus. |
objections can be settled here reg PM Modi comment on tukde tukde gangLodoVena (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- As I've said before, reproducing soundbytes from any individual politician is a problem of undue weight; the article needs to be based on what secondary sources say. You've now edit-warred this content in five times, without ever explaining why it belongs in the article. You really need to provide such an explanation immediately. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
refer this the sounbyte of individual politician like P Chidambaram is alredy present in this article. is this WPDUE?LodoVena (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)