 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Tuina (moth) → Tuina – The redirect at Tuina is to what appears to be a misspelling of Tui na. Better to put the unambiguously correctly-spelt article in that position. 86.** IP (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose From https://www.google.com/webhp?ion=1#q=%22tuina%22+chinese+massage&tbm=bks , it appears to be an alternate spelling of "tui na". -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. See JHunterJ's evidence above. Too easily confused with Tui na – a much more popular topic; and it is very often spelt "tuina", as it is simply a romanisation corresponding to two Chinese characters that function as one "word". See first sentence in that article: "Tui na or tuina[1] (Chinese: 推拏[citation needed] or 推拿; pinyin: tuī ná), is a form of Chinese manipulative therapy ...". (As recently edited by JHunterJ, quite correctly; I have bought books on tuina in China, to bring to someone in Australia. They usually have the form "tuina" in the title.) NoeticaTea? 02:27, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dicklyon. Noetica makes a good point, too. Tony (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose it is not a mispelling, it is an alternate spelling. It is therefore correctly spelt. 70.24.248.211 (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.