Talk:Tug of war at the 1900 Summer Olympics
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lemonade51 in topic GA Review
 | Tug of war at the 1900 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 8, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Tug of war at the 1900 Summer Olympics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I have removed the links to each of the individual athletes as they are unlikely to ever be written. Where there have been valid links, I have left them. Further links can then be re-added as and when appropriate Robotmannick 03:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tug of war at the 1900 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Been ages since I've done a GA review...
- "comprised primarily of" → composed primarily of
- Any idea if the Herald refers to the Scottish paper, or The (Old) Sun?
Other than that, can't really fault this. Prose is fine, references are formatted consistently, no issues with dab or dead links. Two images hold appropriate licences. It's as comprehensive as it's going to get. Shall pass once you get back to me. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Lemonade51: Thanks for the review! That first one always catches me out - fixed it now. The latter was still referring to the New York Herald, I have clarified that in the article now. Harrias talk 13:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Will pass, nice work. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)