Talk:Tudor Arms Apartments (Portland, Oregon)

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First entry edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This is my first entry, so maybe I've done something wrong, but the Tudor Arms Apartments is my home. I am the Home Owners Association Board Secretary and only want to have a historical reference to my building. Nothing is for sale. Please let me know what I need to change in order to meet the non-advertising requirements. Thank you. Mettled (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It does read like a sales brochure. I'm not sure it can be modified to appear objective without a total rewrite, which is why it's been proposed for deletion. Stickier, however, is the issue of notability - is this building notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia? I don't think it is. Dethme0w (talk) 05:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a copywriter so maybe I can get some help rewriting this. I do believe it belongs on Wikipedia because there was already a link existing in the Portland section of the Portland Historical Society page. Mettled (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Being on the national register just about guarantees notability, I took out what I deemed the most advert-like text. Did you by chance copy and paste the info from somewhere? Be sure to be aware of our copyright policy. Also, anything in the article that is original research--that is, it's from personal observation--you will need to back the info up with citations to reliable sources. Overall however, I think this is a fine first article and the pics are very good. I don't think you've done anything wrong, but be sure to check out our conflict-of-interest policy just to be safe. Happy editing! Katr67 (talk) 02:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation for Bugsy Seigel edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The information regarding Bugsy Seigel and Mickey Cohen was taken from a engraved plaque that is posted outside apartment #308. The plaque says exactly the same thing as the paragraph without reference to its source. I can post a photograph of the plaque if that helps. In the meantime, I will investigate the origins of the plaque and see if I can find out more. Thank you very much for the help in cleaning up this article. Mettled (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic