Talk:True North (Once Upon a Time)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the True North (Once Upon a Time) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | True North (Once Upon a Time) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 29, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Emma Caulfield (pictured) was cast in a Once Upon a Time episode because the producers "couldn't think of anyone better to trap two children in a house and try to eat them"? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:True North (Once Upon a Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 17:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Oh, hey, Krycek.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- "in a parallel with the story of Hansel and Gretel (Lord/Collins)" -> I'd say it's already implied that the kids fit these roles, so I'd drop the bracketed bit here.
"who invites him to hang out." -> seems a little informal.
" [in 'The Price of Gold']" -> both source and MOS use double quote marks ("The Price of God"), so stick with that.
"as Young Peter Bishop and Young Olivia Dunham" -> "as younger versions of Peter Bishop and Olivia Dunham"
"It earned a 3.3/8 among adults between the ages of 18 and 49," -> include a link to Nielsen rating and explain what the numbers mean (% of sets in use/total population)
"'ong enough to watch 'True North.'"" -> dropping the single quotes and adding italics would be an acceptable typographical change.
- "in a parallel with the story of Hansel and Gretel (Lord/Collins)" -> I'd say it's already implied that the kids fit these roles, so I'd drop the bracketed bit here.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Grand
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Although it does seem complicated, I'm wondering if the plot section is a little long.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Yep
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Fine
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are grand.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not a lot of work to be done here, on hold for seven days. GRAPPLE X 20:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Yeah I know the plot is a bit long, but I can't really find anything useless to trim, as this is one of those series that usually has every little detail possessing some level of significance. Otherwise I believe I've addressed your concerns (italicized True North and tweaked the prose). Thanks, as always, for reviewing! Wow, that man certainly knows his science fiction...! Ruby 2010/2013 04:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on True North (Once Upon a Time). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928034954/https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2012/nat01022012.pdf to https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2012/nat01022012.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928034954/https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2012/nat01022012.pdf to https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2012/nat01022012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)