Talk:Tropical Storm Norman (2000)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Miss Madeline in topic Merge?
 | Tropical Storm Norman (2000) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Merge? edit
This article is nearing terrible. It's short, mostly unreferenced, and poorly written. We've merged it several times, only to have it unmerged by its creator. Thoughts? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 11:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
i do not see one speling mistake.--Leave Message orYellow Evan home 13:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- There's more to being well-written then just being spelled correctly. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- I merged it again. The article was just a split from the main article, with some ill-formatted additions. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- I expanded the lead and added preps and the rainfall map to the impact section. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- I merged it again. The article was just a split from the main article, with some ill-formatted additions. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tropical Storm Norman (2000)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Decent storm history, but no lede. Low-end Start-Class at best. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 08:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 08:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)