Talk:Tropical Storm Etau (2009)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Etau (2009)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Note: This Article needs a slight update before its GAN is passed Jason Rees (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• 3 Public domain images (hosted at Commons) ok.
• Meteorological history: winds peaked at 95 km/h (60 mph 10-minute sustained) and a barometric pressure of 990 hPa (mbar).[12] - the infobox says the winds peaked at 75 km/h + pressure bottomed at 992 hPa

 DoneJason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• Preparations: evacuated roughly 47,000 residents from western regions along the coast - do you know where specifically the evacuations took place? Is this a separate evacuation than the In Hyogo state, another 2,000 people were evacuated...
  • As far as i am aware they were seperate but i cant check with the primary author to check as he is rather [off at me for some reason]Jason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Since this assertion that it was a further 2,000 people cannot be verified by the provided references, it fails Wikipedia:Verifiability --maclean (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Ive removed it for now If cyclonebiskit canverify they were seperate he can add them back in.Jason Rees (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
        • Removed what? Nothing has been removed. --maclean (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
          • Actually it has been removed Unless im missing something?.Jason Rees (talk) 02:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
            • ok. maclean (talk) 02:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
• Make spelling of Hyōgo Prefecture consistent.

 DoneJason Rees (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

• Do you know if there has been any update on the 2 missing people?

  Im trying to keep an eye on damages of the PTS and their hasnt been any update on the 2 missing that ive seen.Jason Rees (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

--maclean (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Tropical Storm Etau (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://dynasmon.fortunecity.com/JMA.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw/ax/axpq20.rjtd..txt
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gWZP4EDI0LBXJSGN8DsQdxuN2BSg
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/4-dead-10-missing-after-heavy-rain-in-hyogo
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jNVAYTNIBVFdGeqXR_p6MJwKRP4w
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/252/story/802280.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=512af756-aedc-45bf-808d-f317ceb5b111
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/08/20098102565730287.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hTgdsrVRA_SxHX-hN9GnUhpEcxBQ
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539069,00.html?test=latestnews

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)