This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Tropeognathus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
This skull[1] shown in the article seems to differ from all other depictions in being much shorter, and it also appears to be sculpted. Anyone knows what's up with it? FunkMonk (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I put it up there because I thought I had more time to organize at least the classification section, I was eventually gonna remove it 'cause the crest seems to large, at least compared to other reconstructions, but I forgot because of all the other many edits I've done. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 05:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Weird that the AMNH would put out such an unconventional reconstruction. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 22:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The sign underneath seems to say "Reconstructed cast of National Museum of Brazil (unintelligible specimen number)", so one would assume it isn't just taken out of thin air? On the other hand, the hind part of the skull in the taxobox image also seems really weird:[2] How much is actually known of the skull? FunkMonk (talk) 22:52, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
I think a whole skull was uncovered by Kellner in 2013. The skeletal reconstruction does seem strange, the back portion of the lower jaw seems to thin, at least in my perspective. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 15:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tropeognathus_skull_fossil_-_Pterosaurs_Flight_in_the_Age_of_Dinosaurs_(44900251641).jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tropeognathus_mesembrinus_MN_02.jpg){kind=link}