Talk:Troop sleeper

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Buidhe in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleTroop sleeper was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 6, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
May 14, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA

edit

I think that your article is close to GA for a topic like this. The main problem I see it that it is one long section. I am sure that if it is broken up a bit, it will make it through to being a GA. Zoli Elo 04:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. (t · c) buidhe 00:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Last assessed in 2009. Multiple areas missing citations and I am concerned about depth and breadth of coverage as well. This exclusively covers WWII troop sleepers but I've found evidence [1] [2] [3] they were used in WW1 as well. Even if they weren't quite the same as the purpose-built WW2 sleepers, there should be at least some basic background information given. I am also not impressed with the small number of sources in the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.