Talk:Trivial objections
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 147.251.53.93 in topic External Link
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trivial objections article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 May 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source
editHi, could we get a source for this article? - Ta bu shi da yu 08:17, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Posted on external links in the main article. --Viriditas 10:54, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Cheers. - Ta bu shi da yu 12:46, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Please see this link for the difference between Plurium interrogationum and Trivial objections. --Viriditas 07:44, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
How about an example, anyone? --60.231.32.208 07:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- There are numerous examples of trivial objections at the external link provided, however it may be a good idea to include some on the page. --Viriditas | Talk 08:29, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Worst. Example. Ever. — mæstro t/c, 14:17, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Is this one better? --147.251.53.93 (talk) 12:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
External Link
editI do not see the relevance of this link (to the Adam Smith Institute). Fishal 20:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
The link is also broken, so it was removed. --147.251.53.93 (talk) 12:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)