This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I had my most of my article on TAS-102 deleted and the explanation was "remove load of content based on primary sources". I was wondering what that means? I felt the information was relevant to the drug and explained studies pertinent to its development and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The sources I obtained my information from were also from legitimate scientific journals that were essentially published results of the clinical trials conducted with the drug. Ukystu85 (talk) 02:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please read WP:MEDRS and especially the section, "Respect secondary sources". If you want to read more about why MEDRS exists, you could look at a draft essay i wrote (too long right now, needs trimming, sorry) here: User:Jytdog/Why_MEDRS?. Jytdog (talk) 03:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply