![]() | Tricholoma vernaticum has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 7, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Tricholoma vernaticum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tricholoma vernaticum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Looks uncontroversial.
- "and several former mycorrhizal Armillaria" How about "several mycorrhizal former Armillaria"?
- Done. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Armillaria olida or Armillaria olidum? Also, what does the species name mean?
- Stinky – added etymology. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- "The name Tricholoma olida was unavailable for this species, because it was previously used in 1920 by Josef Velenovský," Probably not important, but it is a short article- do we know what that's known as today?
- That name is unchanged, have redlinked it. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- "The ring, located" Link?
- Done. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's odd that you spell out micrometer on the fourth mention, but not otherwise.
- That's because that instance is used adjectivally, and our MoS says to spell out units when used this way. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- "typically in the fall season" Autumn, perhaps? Fall is a word not used in the UK; I appreciate that it's in American English, so if you prefer fall, keep it.
- Sure. done. Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Images and sources seem fine. A Google search throws up nothing that's been missed; certainly shorter, but key questions are answered, so I'm happy that it's a suitable GA candidate. J Milburn (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks again JM! Sasata (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)