Talk:Tribhuvan of Nepal/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Merger and cleanup
I have completed the merger and started cleaning the article up. There is one untidy bit in the last paragraph which needs to be tied in by someone with some knowledge of the article subject, I will also add appropriate tags --Matt 02:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
there is a color portrait of Tribhuvan (the same as the one currently there only in color) could we use it? Rcduggan 14:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
spelling of name
The spelling of his name is not consistent in the article. The title of the article is spelled Tribhuvan, but the first paragraph and the info box use Tribhuhvan. Which is correct? ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The first spelling is correct: "Tribhuvan"Ratnaman (talk) 12:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
NPOV Violation
This is a very tendentious, biased article. It makes unsubstantiated claims about Tribhuvan's bahavior (in clumsy English). It makes inappropriate, and unverifiable, assertions about the motivations and mindset of the subject. A biography piece is not the proper forum for the writer to express personal political viewpoints. (I am stilling learning Wiki formatting, etc. Please excuse errors in making entries here.) Ratnaman (talk) 12:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with the above assessment of the article. I have removed the following sentence from the article: "The prime minister, Chandra Shumshere Rana always had his way with the young king who was interested only in worldly pleasure and copulating activities." That is a rather harsh statement to make about an eight year old child, and I cannot imagine him being interested in "copulations" at that point in his life. Furthermore, the claim is unreferenced. Looking forward to a rewrite of the article, based on multiple references.--Iacobus (talk) 03:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I totally agree as well, this is a perfect example of biased writing style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.8.48 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)