Talk:Triangulum Australe/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: StringTheory11 (talk · contribs) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Some quick comments:
- Check refs 22 and 24 for URL problems or dead links.
- There are two refs in the ref section that do not appear to be connected to any footnotes. These should probably be moved into a further reading section or the like.
At a glance, the rest of the article appears to meet GA standards. I'll do a content review later. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Detailed review:
- Characteristics:
- North should not be capitalized.
- What are the pointers? (I know the answer, but I don't think a random person reading the article would)
- Notable features:
- Probably shouldn't say that it is an equilateral triangle, as the illustration at the top contradicts this...
- History:
- All good here!
Other than these few issues, the article appears to be GA-worthy. Short article, but there's not much else to write about the subject. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)