Talk:Triaenops menamena/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ucucha in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just two comments

  • angular process is red-linked and unexplained
    • Added a little explanation.
  • In the lead, you illustrate the sizes with wing lengths — I'd expect total length to be the more obvious figure, but I know nothing about bats.
    • In bats, forearm length is among the most prominent measurements. I can also replace it with total length if needed, though; it's already in the table. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: