Talk:Treeshrew
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
Is the little tree-style diagram the standard Wikipedia method of describing such classification? Could it be handled better (Perhaps an image instead)?
Picture? edit
Someone get a photo of these creatures!! I must say i am intreaged to what this relitive of our actually looks like. I believe they feature in the new guinness advert: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/35459/guinness_evolution/ mastodon 02:11, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
not a primate edit
A reference to the molecular studies showing that they were primates is needed to be in keeping with Wikipedia standards, any chance of adding one? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.167.202.126 (talk • contribs).
Tupaiidae origins? edit
I'm wondering if the word for Tupaiidae originates from the malay(?) word, Tupai? Gross (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Uncles of humankind? edit
Okey moleculary they might be distinct because of many tens of million years of indepedent evolution. But morphologically (and neurologically as far as I know) they look extremely alike to our most ancient Plesiadapiform ancestor. I do believe they are at most morphologically unchanged from the time of our common ancestor rather than being the result of convergent evolution. That's off course my PoV, but am I so irrational? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.191.48 (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)