Talk:Trees (poem)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1ST7 (talk · contribs) 01:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this nomination. Initial comments should be posted within the next 24 hours. --1ST7 (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I did some minor copyediting; I hope you don't mind. Here's the review:

1. Well-written

   • One issue with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch: "Ironically, Kenton Kilmer points out that while his father was..." Please reword this phrase.

• Done (09SEP13) replaced "points out" with "stated" per MOS--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

1. Verifiable with no original research:

   • The last two sentences in the second paragraph of "popular appeal" need a citation.

• Addressed (09SEP13) - removed editorial judgment. --ColonelHenry (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

1. • This also needs a citation: "Despite this, the popular appeal of "Trees" continues—much to the chagrin of critics."

• Addressed (09SEP13) - removed sentence that was an editorial judgment.--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

1. Broad in its coverage:
2. Neutral:
3. Stable:
4. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

Aside from these few things, the article looks ready for promotion. These issues shouldn't take long to fix, so I don't think it's necessary to put the article on hold. Thanks for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 05:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Congratulations, and thanks again for your work. --1ST7 (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)