Talk:Treehouse of Horror XXV

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Treehouse of Horror XXV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments from reviewer

• In the image's caption, I would expand upon what it depicts?
  • Done '''tAD''' (talk) 09:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• Why is the showrunner necessary for the infobox?
  • This seems to be the standard method for Simpsons episodes. See the Featured Articles Lisa the Vegetarian and Homer's Enemy. Even though this is necessarily a season rather than episode detail, some episodes are holdovers from the previous season, such as FA-Class Cape Feare, which was part of the Jean-Reiss season 4 production run but broadcast in David Mirkin's season 5 '''tAD''' (talk) 09:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• That's fine. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

• Add more from the production section into the lead.
  • Done (I can add more if more is needed) '''tAD''' (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• You have a duplicate link to Homer in the synopsis.
  • Done '''tAD''' (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• "The segment ends with the original version of Homer unsuccessfully trying to photograph a good portrait of the two families together, a direct homage to the short "Family Portrait" from The Tracey Ullman Show." How do we know this?
  • Removed as OR '''tAD''' (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• In Production, why is the first paragraph only one sentence long?
  • Paragraphs merged '''tAD''' (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• I would sprinkle in the EW ref maybe one more time throughout the para (after the direct quote perhaps)--it just makes things better for appearances.
  • Done '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• Duplicate links here include Stanley Kubrick and A Clockwork Orange (film) (from the lead) and Eyes Wide Shut (from the synopsis)
  • Done. As far as I know it is acceptable to have links repeated from the lead and image captions '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• Link to "Super Franchise Me" where you say "the previous week's episode."
  • Done (without WP:EGG) '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• Are these the only reviews you could find?
  • I can indeed look for more, although it's more about what they say rather than how many we have '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
• Put in a critical consensus sentence as well as things that critics tended to like and dislike about the episode.
  • Done '''tAD''' (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

@The Almightey Drill: Nice work! Just a few things to fix before I can pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 04:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

@The Almightey Drill: Good work! I'm satisfied enough to pass now. If you get a chance, could you review one of my Veronica Mars articles up at GAN. If you can't, it's okay. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: